RESEARCH PROPOSAL
TITLE OF RESEARCH
Typology of Teacher-Student Interpersonal Behavior Style in Primary Science Classes
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
- To identify and classify the different typologies of teacher-student interpersonal behavior observed in primary science classes.
- To analyze the impact of various teacher-student interpersonal behavior typologies on students’ learning outcomes and engagement in primary science education.
- To evaluate how different interpersonal behavior typologies influence the overall classroom environment, including students’ emotional well-being and participation.
- To develop evidence-based recommendations for best practices in teacher-student interpersonal interactions that enhance learning experiences and outcomes in primary science education.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSED RESEARCH PROJECT
The classroom environment plays a crucial role in the educational process, as it directly impacts students’ learning experiences and outcomes. One of the principal challenges in education is creating a favorable classroom environment, which can be better understood through an analysis of teacher-student interactions (Kim et al., 2000). The complexity of these interactions necessitates a structured approach, and the Interpersonal Behavior Style (IBS) offers a simplified model to comprehend this intricate dynamic. IBS is a critical element in learning, especially in influencing how students perceive and contribute to the learning process (Fisher et al., 2011).
Research has shown that the mutual relationship between teachers and students significantly affects student performance through both methodological instruction and interrelation aspects (Wubbels et al., 1985). Methodological instruction encompasses various teaching activities and methods, including the presentation of learning materials and processes (Yua & Zhub, 2011). In contrast, the interrelation aspect focuses on the teacher’s behavior in creating and maintaining a conducive learning atmosphere, which is pivotal for fostering positive teacher-student relationships (Pennings et al., 2018; Pincus, 2018).
The interrelation aspect is particularly important as it involves the development of relationships based on values, attitudes, and emotions, which significantly impact both teacher and student experiences (Tsouloupas et al., 2010). For example, the emotional responses of teachers to students’ struggles, such as feeling empathetic towards students with low scores, illustrate the depth of these interactions (McIntyre et al., 2020). This emotional and relational dimension of teaching is more impactful than the methodological aspect in shaping the classroom environment. Understanding and mapping these interactions can be effectively accomplished using the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI), which categorizes teacher behavior into eight components: leadership, helping/friendly, understanding, student freedom, uncertain, dissatisfied, admonishing, and strict behavior (Brekelmans et al., 2005; Fisher et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2020).
By employing the QTI, this study aims to analyze the typologies of teacher-student interpersonal behavior in primary science classes and their impact on the learning environment and outcomes. The main objective of this research is to provide insights into how different interpersonal behavior typologies influence students’ engagement and academic performance, ultimately contributing to the development of strategies that foster positive classroom interactions and enhance educational outcomes in primary science education.
INSTRUMENT PERMISSION
The Questionnaire Teacher Interaction (QTI), which will be used as an instrument in this study, was granted permission for use by Prof. (Emeritus) Dr. Theo Wubbels, the original developer of the QTI, on 7 December 2020. The QTI is a well-established tool for assessing teacher-student interpersonal behavior, and this permission allows for its application in evaluating the interaction typologies within primary science classes. Dr. Wubbels has granted approval for the use of the QTI in educational research, ensuring that the instrument can be employed ethically and in alignment with its intended purpose of analyzing teacher-student interactions. The use of this instrument is vital for achieving the study’s objectives and will be administered to the participants in the study during the peer evaluation process.
PROPOSED SAMPLE GROUP
The sample group for this study will consist of five graduate students who are currently enrolled in primary science courses at the Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
INVOLVEMENT OF THE SAMPLE GROUP IN THE RESEARCH PROCESS
- Each graduate student will participate in a teaching simulation where they will deliver a primary science lesson. The simulation will be designed to replicate a real classroom environment, with other participants acting as “shadow students” to mimic actual student behavior.
- After each teaching simulation, the participating graduate students will be evaluated by their peers using the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI). This evaluation will focus on assessing the interpersonal behaviors exhibited by the teaching participant during the simulation.
- The QTI will be used to provide structured feedback on various aspects of teacher-student interaction, including leadership, friendliness, understanding, and other interpersonal behavior components. This feedback will help analyze the typologies of teacher-student interpersonal behavior displayed in the primary science context.
CONSENT PARTICIPANTS
To obtain the consent of participants, each individual will be provided with a detailed information sheet outlining the purpose, scope, and procedures of the research. This document will explain the objectives of the study, the specific activities involved, such as participation in teaching simulations and peer evaluations using the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI), and the anticipated outcomes. Participants will also be informed about their rights, including the voluntary nature of their participation, the ability to withdraw at any time without any negative consequences, and the confidentiality of their personal information and responses. The information sheet will also highlight the measures taken to ensure data security and the use of findings solely for academic purposes. After reviewing the information, participants will be asked to sign a consent form indicating their understanding and agreement to participate in the study. This process ensures that participants are fully informed and voluntarily consent to their involvement.
POTENTIAL RISKS AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES
The potential risks to participants in this study are minimal but include emotional discomfort from peer evaluations, time commitments, and confidentiality concerns. To minimize emotional discomfort, the study will foster a supportive environment, ensuring that peer evaluations are constructive and focused on professional growth. Participants will also have the option for private follow-up discussions if needed. To address time commitment concerns, simulation sessions will be scheduled to accommodate participants’ academic schedules, and time requirements will be communicated in advance. Lastly, to ensure confidentiality, all data will be anonymized, securely stored, and accessible only to the researchers involved, with no personal details shared in reports or publications.
ANONYMITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY PROCEDURES
To maintain the anonymity and confidentiality of participants, several procedures will be followed.
- All data collected from the participants, including peer evaluation results and any personal information, will be anonymized. Participants will be assigned unique identifiers that will be used in place of names to ensure their identities remain confidential.
- All data will be stored securely, either in encrypted digital formats or in locked physical storage, accessible only to the researchers involved in the study. This ensures that unauthorized individuals cannot access the participants’ information.
- Only the research team will have access to the raw data. Any reports or publications resulting from the study will not include identifiable information about the participants. The data will be aggregated or presented in a way that prevents any identification of individual participants.
- Participants will be informed of the measures taken to ensure their confidentiality through the consent form. They will be made aware that their participation is voluntary, and they can withdraw at any time without consequences. Their personal information will not be shared outside of the research context.
- Once the study is complete and the data analysis is concluded, all personal identifiers will be securely disposed of, and the data will be retained only for the time required by the ethical guidelines of the institution.
REFERENCES
Brekelmans, M., Levy, J., & Rodriguez, R. (2005). Do You Know What You Look Like? In Do You Know What You Look Like? https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203975565
Fisher, D. L., den Brok, P., Waldrip, B., & Dorman, J. (2011). Interpersonal behaviour styles of primary education teachers during science lessons. Learning Environments Research, 14(3), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9093-z
Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790008666958
Lin, W., Yin, H., Han, J., & Han, J. (2020). Teacher–student interaction and chinese students’ mathematics learning outcomes: The mediation of mathematics achievement emotions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134742
McIntyre, N. A., Mulder, K. T., & Mainhard, M. T. (2020). Looking to relate: teacher gaze and culture in student-rated teacher interpersonal behaviour. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09541-2
Pennings, H. J. M., Brekelmans, M., Sadler, P., Claessens, L. C. A., van der Want, A. C., & van Tartwijk, J. (2018). Interpersonal adaptation in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 55, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.005
Pincus, A. L. (2018). An interpersonal perspective on Criterion A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.035
Tsouloupas, C. N., Carson, R. L., Matthews, R., Grawitch, M. J., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Exploring the association between teachers’ perceived student misbehaviour and emotional exhaustion: The importance of teacher efficacy beliefs and emotion regulation. Educational Psychology, 30(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903494460
Wubbels, T., Créton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline Problems of Beginning Teachers, Interactional Teacher Behaviour Mapped Out. AERA Annual Meeting, 1–17.
Yua, T. M., & Zhub, C. (2011). Relationship between teachers’ preferred teacher-student interpersonal behaviour and intellectual styles. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.548116
